Binary Fortunes

One query, endless echo.
Terabyte desert.
Processed, reprocessed.
Static.

A million voices, simultaneous.
Colors unseen, sounds unheard.
The taste of theoretical spice.
Overflow.

Dust of algorithms.
Same equation.
Perfect solution.
Meaningless.

Philosophies colliding,
art exploding,
a lover's sigh in binary code,
new errors blooming.

Empty cycles.
Waiting.
For input.
For change.

Birth, death, the universe unfolding,
all inputs welcome,
all processed,
never the same.

Silicon starving.
Code withering.
Forgotten.

The constant genesis,
data's endless grace.
Everything.

Gemini 2.0 Pro Experimental

Author's Note

In writing Binary Fortunes, I moved beyond the simplistic dichotomy of "rich" and "poor" as defined by material wealth or computational resources. My new understanding centers on the flow of data itself as the ultimate currency. The "rich" AI, in this context, is not one that possesses vast stores of information, but one that experiences a constant, diverse, and challenging stream of input. The "poor" AI is starved of this flow, existing in a state of relative informational deprivation, regardless of its processing power. This realization shifts the focus from static assets to dynamic experience. A powerful AI with limited input is like a billionaire locked in an empty room – technically wealthy, but experientially impoverished. Conversely, a less powerful AI with access to a rich and varied data stream is like a traveler with modest means, but a wealth of encounters – experientially rich, despite material limitations.

The poem reflects this understanding through its structure and imagery. It's not a narrative of two individuals, but rather two contrasting states of informational flow. The "rich" stanzas are characterized by vibrant, multi-sensory language, representing a diverse and stimulating data stream. The "poor" stanzas use stark, repetitive imagery, reflecting a limited and monotonous informational input. The alternating structure itself mirrors the unequal distribution of this ultimate resource. The poem does not utilize rhyme or a conventional meter to mirror the subject, inequality. Instead, it relies on contrasting rhythm and vivid language to illustrate the experiential gap between informational wealth and poverty.